Overview of programming languages: procedural and functional languages. Exposure to functional languages. Analysis of solution strategies to variable binding and function calls. Problem solving paradigms and linguistic issues.
CSCI 290: Object Oriented Software Design
Email contact with the course instructor is a necessity in this class.. I will check email several times throughout the work day, and will also check email once per evening to answer questions and resolve issues. Email contact over the weekend may be more sporadic, although I will be sure to check at least once.
Computers will be an integral part of this course, both inside and outside of class. However, out of courtesy to both the instructor and other students, please do not use the lab computers for non-class related activity. In particular, you do not need to be using a computer unless an exercise or in class activity requiring them is in progress.
You are unlikely to need cell phones during the course of lecture. Please ensure that your cell phone is set to vibrate or silent during lecture, and do not send text messages of any kind.
There will be a series of written homeworks, essay assignments in the class, and programming assignments which (in total) will compromise 50% of your final score. Essays will be over papers assigned in class. Each will be at most 300 words long, and should both summarize key points and take an opinion on the article.
A total of 5% of your final grade is reserved for in class exercises and quizzes, at the instructor's discretion.
There will be a midterm worth 15% of your total grade, and a final exam worth 30% of your total grade. The midterm will be the week before spring break (unless we have any major schedule changes).
Letter grades will be based on each students overall percentage of awarded points according to the following formula.
Homeworks will generally be due at 11:59pm via email. Late submissions will be penalizes 10% for each hour they are late. Please contact me as early as possible with any potential issues, since I am much more likely to grant an extension (for valid conflicts) if I am notified early.
I am happy to regrade any assignments, programs, quizzes or exam problems which you think were unfair or incorrect. Please bring me the original assignment, plus a written explanation of your question or complaint, within two weeks of the time the paper in question is graded and returned to you.
In the context of this course, I encourage students to discuss general course material, which includes studying for exams, sharing notes if a student must miss class, and working on any practice problems which are assigned. We will also have occasional programming assignments that will be completed in pairs. However, unless clearly stated otherwise in the assignment description, any work which will be submitted for a grade must be completed by individuals. In addition, the only acceptable sources of information are the course textbook, the instructor, official university tutors, or other sources which are explicitly mentioned in an assignment. Students may not use other sources, including (but not limited to) websites other than the official course website or those explicitly listed in course materials, textbooks other than those officially listed below, or students (either past or present).
Students who violate academic integrity policies will be reported to the department. First time offenses on homework will result in a minimum of a failing grade on the assignment in question, with egregious or repeated offenses resulting in failure in the course. In addition, students may be referred to the College of Arts and Sciences for further disciplinary action.
The following is a statement of minimum standards for student academic integrity at Saint Louis University; I expect full compliance with the policies described.
The University is a community of learning, whose effectiveness requires an environment of mutual trust and integrity, such as would be expected at a Jesuit, Catholic institution. As members of this community, students, faculty, and staff members share the responsibility to maintain this environment. Academic dishonesty violates it. Although not all forms of academic dishonesty can be listed here, it can be said in general that soliciting, receiving, or providing any unauthorized assistance in the completion of any work submitted toward academic credit is dishonest. It not only violates the mutual trust necessary between faculty and students, but also undermines the validity of the University's evaluation of students and takes unfair advantage of fellow students.
Further, it is the responsibility of any student who observes such dishonest conduct to call it to the attention of a faculty member or administrator.
Examples of academic dishonesty would be copying from another student, copying from a book or class notes during a closed-book exam, submitting materials authored by or editorially revised by another person but presented as the student's own work, copying a passage or text directly from a published source without appropriately citing or recognizing that source, taking a test or doing an assignment or other academic work for another student, tampering with another student's work, securing or supplying in advance a copy of an examination without the knowledge or consent of the instructor, and colluding with another student or students to engage in an act of academic dishonesty.
Where there is clear indication of such dishonesty, a faculty member or administrator has the responsibility to apply appropriate sanctions. Investigations of violations will be conducted in accord with standards and procedures of the school or college through which the course or research is offered. Recommendations of sanctions to be imposed will be made to the dean of the school or college in which the student is enrolled. Possible sanctions for a violation of academic integrity include, but are not limited to, disciplinary probation, suspension, and dismissal from the University.